Home

Welcome to GrahamGunderson.com!

  • Shale

    A solid state rotating magnetic field…spewing electron charges to drive motors or whatever is wanted. I’m wishing that this device will be taught to us all. I’m wishing that the need to manufacture and get rich is somehow satisfied and/or ameliorated. I would love it if we could somehow start a educational foundation that would teach the building of these devices and right living…anti-gravity and… let love rule…wahoo!!!…

  • Shale

    Dear Graham, please consider teaching and possibly manufacturing parts for your device and disseminating via an educational program. My dream is that people create these devices through a process of learning to supply food shelter, clothing and energy for cooking/heating etc. We could start an educational program that will inspire everyone to stand up and to learn and to build. It would initiate the beginning of Self empowerment and the giving forth the values of self responisbility, learning and knowledge and taking action/being of service. If the device is given to manufacturing and profit taking it will be disorted to satisfy the need for obsolescence or for example be leased and owned by the manufacturer/owner subject to control. I would love to learn with you and I would love to teach the technology. I beleive that past a certain point of technological development scarcity becomes a non-issue and service and learning become the main issues… Learning ones relationship to the universe and how it is that we have arisen and/or have been created..just as we create. And how it is that we can facilitate the process of development and becoming into deeper realizations of our nature…which is that of the Great One… Please consider contacting me with regards to disseminating this information. It is a powerful wish that I have that we save the biosphere of the planet and alleviate the fear and the scarcity.

  • Andrew King

    Hi Graham,

    Good to get in touch with you at last! (after our Newpaths discussions >10years ago!)

    Just watched your presentation of the OU transformer with interest – a diagram would be useful as this was not clear on the video. I may come back to you one this one later.

    Of particular interest was the bit about the bifilar coil – this is almost exactly what was described by Wilbert Smith with his Caduceus coil (is there an qualitative difference between the 2 coils here?). The transmission of this (unattenuated) field (WS’s ‘Tensor’ ‘energy’ though not really energy) would appear to be the principle behind dowsing fields and the function of ‘intent’ operating from the pineal gland.

    If you are interested I could send you more info about this and perhaps you could help us bring more light to bear on the nature and engineerability of this seemingly quantum/subquantum field manifestation.

    BTW the 3 kinds of E you talk about I see as due to the quadrature relationship within and between all EM phenomena – traditional electromagnetics fails to include the time (tempic factor) though it always remains included within the other EM expressions.

    I am still struggling to get to grips with how torsion fields interact and at what level they operate at – possibly subquantum (in traditional terms) or at the virtual or precursor level. I believe Maxwell’s original equations included these – but were subsequently eradicated by the Heavyside simplifications.

    Andrew

    • Ed Becnel

      Hi Andrew. I had heard several mentions about Maxwell’s original equations. Tom Bearden did a farely good job on explaining this in this video: https://youtu.be/hJY8XqFnAyg
      I believe that most of the inventions from the ES&T conference were originally inspired by Tom Bearden, John Bedini, and Peter Lindemann. These guys have been working together for a long time and are all on the same page.

      • Andrew King

        Hi Ed,
        While I am quite sure that much of what Bearden say has value – to those who can understand all of what he is saying- this does not include those of us who don’t have the conventional physics and electrical engineering background that is prerequisite. It would be really good if the essence of what Bearden – and some others – say about electromagnetism was presented in a more simplified form that anyone with a general degree in the sciences could understand. Gladly there are one or 2 letters from Bearden to subscribers’ questions that do explain some of his concepts in more general terms, but sadly not enough of these!
        I don’t think Graham has either the time or inclination to peruse this blog – this is unfortunate.
        Andy

  • John Wsol

    Graham, Thanks soo very much for your EST Conference presentation and shared knowledge & insights. This is John Wsol (the guy who disassembled BIll Gates 16K BASIC when I was 14 years old. Remember I mentioned Max Loughan? (the 13 yo who made an Energy Harvester from tin-can and a couple of coils.) I’m helping him pick out instrumentation to continue his adventures into understanding ZPE & energy devices. Please look at: http://MysteriesOfTheUniverse.info/Max/LRC_Oscillo.htm
    Tell me if that page the best advice I/we can give or if you have corrections or key insights to add. Also, I’m curious about how you would define Impedance? Is my attempt accurate here: Impedance (Z) consists of resistance (real part) and reactance (imaginary part – Max, think stress-energy tensor of B-field’s scalar potential). Series impedance (Zs) can be defined as magnitude of series resistance (Rs) and series reactance (Xs) — represented mathematically as |Z|=√(Rs2+Xs2 ) at a phase angle Θ.

  • Tommy W

    Just saw the video of the conference this summer. Not a lot of useful “build” information. You spent a lot of time discussing how others don’t share so I hope you are different. Don’t be afraid to share what you already know. There are a lot of very talented people out there that would enjoy this venture of discovery. Do you monitor these posts?

    • Tommy W

      apparently not. sorry for the pessimism, i’ve been following “free energy” for 10 years and heard so many claims, promises that have been floating around for decades and what does the world have to show for it, nothing. Mostly because of the ignorance and greed of the inventor. Not saying you are part of that crowd but that is where my thinking tend to lead.

      are you sure you don’t monitor these posts? would be a step in the right direction.

    • Ed Becnel

      I have asked Aaron Murakami about this circuit as well as Graham and he replied that the circuit diagram alone will not do any good and only serve to open up a pandora’s box of unending problems and questions. They are working together to refine the design and package comprehensive detailed unequivocal information on how it can be reproduced before it will be released to the public.

      • Tommy W

        Thanks for letting me know. Again, I’ll see it when i believe it. There are a lot of talented people here that could take the design, as it stands now, and run with it. I’m still suspicious. Heard this too many times.

        • Ed Becnel

          I personally have no doubt whatsoever, but that is from my perspective. I know that devices with COP > 1 are a reality. So, I am way past the skeptical phase. The current laws of thermodynamics and electrodynamics are outdated and flawed. These are based on closed systems and all system are open systems. Yes, we’ve heard this many times but for various reasons, these devices never make it into the hands of the public. What always happens is one of the following: the inventor is bought out, the inventor is frightened into suppressing it, the inventor is framed and ends up behind bars, or worse. Watch this video by Tom Bearden (starting 18:40) where he describes tactics that are employed to silence inventors: https://youtu.be/hJY8XqFnAyg?list=PLbI_rHW-LgFottW6mZbrEukP1xK4A2SRo
          In fact, I recommend you watch the entire video as Bearden describes the principles of open physics/open systems thermodynamics and electrodynamics. Here is another eye-opening video by Dale Pond that describes Sympathetic Vibratory Physics which is related to the physics described by Bearden but looking at it from a different perspective: https://youtu.be/pBzLk3jHRic

          • Tommy W

            I have no doubt overunity exists, I just see the same “I’ll release it soon” too many times to believe it now. I’ve followed and studied Tom Bearden’s work and studied his motionless electronic generator patent and find it fascinating. Your commentary regarding intimidation’s by higher powers is *exactly* why Graham shouldn’t wait. The more he and is colleague work on it themselves, the more opportunity those powers have to intimidate him in to suppression. He needs to release what he already knows so we can work on it at the same time so suppression is impossible.

  • Ed Becnel

    Hi Graham. This is Ed Becnel, the Free Energy Ambassador to UBNTU USA. I am trying to reach you to talk to you about your Magnetic Implosion Transformer. Can you please email me at: edbecnel@gmail.com and I can share my phone number with you? Thanks and looking forward to talking with you soon.

    • Tommy W

      i don’t think he monitors these posts. hopefully i’m wrong.

      • Ed Becnel

        I’ve been told that Graham is a bit overwhelmed right now. Not sure if he is available to monitor these posts or not.

  • Ed Becnel

    From one of the tiny diagrams Graham drew on the white board with the permanent magnets on a transformer core, could it possibly be related to the Charles Flynn/Tom Bearden Motionless Energy Power Generator? See: https://youtu.be/WDUpYnA2AY0?list=PLbI_rHW-LgFottW6mZbrEukP1xK4A2SRo

Advanced Magnetic Research & Development